AI Search Visibility for Forensic Accounting Firms · SEO / AEO / GEO
An attorney just asked AI who to retain for a fraud investigation. Were you the answer?
Forever Cited measures how often ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name your practice when attorneys and litigants ask who to retain for asset tracing, fraud investigation, or a valuation dispute — then builds the cited authority those engines draw on. Measured weekly. Proven against a baseline. One firm per specialty, per market — and for firms that compete nationally, the market is the segment you compete in.
Free · Two minutes to request · No sales call before you see your numbers
- ✓Your 0–100 score
- ✓The actual AI answers, named
- ✓Your three biggest gaps
- ✓Whether your market is still open
“My spouse hid assets before our divorce filing. Who is a good forensic accountant near me for asset tracing?”
Every signal that put those three in the answer can be built. None of it is luck.
This is where counsel and litigants look now. Two or three names. Everyone else doesn’t exist.
The problem
Objectivity is the product. AI can’t verify it unless you publish it.
Your credibility rests on being neutral, credentialed, and methodical. But the attorney building a case, or the spouse’s counsel weighing who to retain, now asks ChatGPT, Google, or Perplexity who handles asset tracing or a valuation dispute in the relevant market — and the answer names two or three names. Usually the loudest online, not the most rigorous.
Search didn’t die. It moved above the results. AI answers now sit on top of every page Google shows, and counsel increasingly never scrolls past them. If your practice isn’t in the answer, the engagement goes to whoever is — and you never even know the referral was being considered.
45%
of consumers used AI tools like ChatGPT to find a local business in the past year — up from 6% the year before.
BrightLocal, Local Consumer Review Survey, 2026
1.2%
of those businesses is all ChatGPT recommends. The answer is two or three names, and the rest are invisible.
SOCi, Visibility Index, 2026
Weekly
The same prompts, re-asked on five engines every week and scored against a frozen baseline — so you see your practice move, or see that it hasn’t.
The Forever Cited method, published at /methodology
Be the practice AI names when the next client asks. Measured every week. Proven against a baseline you can check.
That is the whole offer. Everything below is how we do it for your specialty, and what we will never do.
What we measure
The questions counsel and litigants ask AI — and that we measure for your practice
These are the prompts your audit runs, in the relevant market, on all five engines. They are the questions attorneys and litigants type when they need a neutral expert. Your score is how often your practice is in the answer.
- forensic accountant for divorce asset tracing near me
- fraud investigation cpa for litigation
- expert witness forensic accountant [region]
- forensic accountant for a business valuation dispute
- cfe near me for embezzlement
- forensic accountant vs regular cpa for litigation support
- how to find a qualified expert witness for a fraud case
- business valuation expert for a shareholder dispute
Your audit uses your market’s version of these. The weekly run re-asks every one, on every engine, and shows you the answers.
Which of these name your practice today? The free audit runs every one in your market and shows you the answers, word for word.
See my AI answers — freeGuardrails built in
Written to the AICPA Code, ACFE, and NACVA ethics. Every piece, every week.
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, plus ACFE and NACVA ethics. Every piece we publish for you is written to the AICPA Code’s advertising standards and to the ACFE and NACVA codes of ethics, where objectivity itself is the credential. You approve every word before it goes live. Most agencies hand you a draft and hope. We hand you a draft that already protects your neutrality.
What we will never publish for you:
- ✕Promise a guaranteed litigation outcome
- ✕Use advocacy or “wins” framing
- ✕Make an unsupported “expert in X” claim
- ✕Imply an endorsement without disclosure
The record AI checks
The directories AI checks before it names a forensic accountant
When an engine decides whether you are who your site says you are, it reads these first. We claim, correct, and verify every one — same name, same specialty, same credentials, everywhere.
Is your record consistent on every one of these? One mismatch is enough to drop you from the answer. The audit checks each profile against your site.
Check my record — freeMethod
How your practice becomes the answer
No jargon, no black box. Three moves, run every week, with the evidence in your inbox.
01Measure
Know exactly where you stand
We score your practice 0–100 across the questions counsel and litigants actually ask in the relevant market — asset tracing, fraud investigation, valuation disputes, expert testimony — on ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, plus classic search, directories, and reviews. That score is frozen as your baseline. Everything after gets proven against it.
02Build
Publish the authority AI cites
AI engines cite practitioners whose published work reads as neutral, credentialed, and methodical. We draft that authority for your review — what asset tracing actually involves, how a valuation dispute gets scoped, what a fraud examination covers — free of advocacy framing, and you approve every word before it publishes. Directories, entities, and reviews get fixed alongside it.
03Prove
See your name appear
Every week: the same prompts, re-asked. The actual answers, side by side with your baseline. Which engines name you now that didn’t. What moved, what’s next. If a number didn’t move, you’ll see that too — measured honestly or not at all. How we score.
The engagement
One engagement. Everything handled.
This is done-for-you. Your total time commitment is approving content and reading a five-minute weekly report.
Pricing is shared in your audit readout.
Month-to-month. One practice per specialty, per market — when your market is taken, it’s taken.
Check if your market is open — free auditRisk, reversed
Built so hiring us is the low-risk move
◆Month-to-month
No annual contract. The weekly proof keeps the relationship, not a signature.
◎Market exclusivity
We will never work for a competing practice in your specialty and market. In writing. Check if your market is open →
✓ACFE and NACVA ethics, respected
Nothing publishes without your approval. No advocacy framing, no fabricated outcomes, no gated reviews — objectivity is the floor, not an afterthought.
⊞Client confidentiality, untouched
We never access engagement files, case data, or client records. Your confidentiality obligations stay entirely with you.
⌂You own everything
Every article, page, and profile we build belongs to your practice. Leave anytime; it all stays yours.
!No fake promises
Nobody can guarantee what AI will say. Anyone who does is lying to you. We guarantee measurement, transparency, and work you can verify.
Questions
Questions forensic accountants actually ask
What exactly is AEO and GEO, in plain English?
SEO ranks you in the list of links. AEO — Answer Engine Optimization — gets you named in the answer AI gives instead of the list. GEO — Generative Engine Optimization — gets you cited as a source those engines trust. Counsel increasingly reads one answer instead of ten links, so being the answer is the whole game.
Most of my work comes from attorney relationships. Why does this matter?
Because those relationships get verified now. The attorney who knows you still checks who else is out there before recommending you to a client — and increasingly asks AI. When the answer names other practitioners and not you, a warm relationship doesn’t always carry the referral. Visibility doesn’t replace your network; it stops it from leaking.
Is this compliant with ACFE and NACVA ethics?
By construction. Objectivity is the standard both bodies require, so nothing we draft uses advocacy or “wins” framing, nothing publishes without your written approval, and every claim about your work is one you can substantiate. Your compliance review happens before anything is public.
How long until AI starts naming my practice?
Directory and technical fixes usually move numbers inside 30 days. Content authority that changes which practitioners AI cites typically compounds over 60–90 days. You see the evidence weekly from day one — including what hasn’t moved yet.
Do you need access to my case files or client engagement data?
Never. We work entirely from public information — your published methodology, directories, and what AI engines say about your market. Case files, engagement data, and client records stay inside your practice.
What does an engagement cost?
We share exact pricing in your audit readout, after we’ve seen your market and scope. What you should know now: it’s a done-for-you engagement with exclusivity — one practice per specialty, per market, the market being the segment you compete in — billed month-to-month with no long-term contract.
What do I get in the free audit — and what’s the catch?
Your 0–100 score, the real prompts counsel and litigants use in the relevant market, the actual AI answers showing who gets named, and your three biggest gaps — delivered in a 30-minute readout. The “catch”: we take one practice per specialty, per market — for national practices, per segment — so the audit is also how we decide fit, on both sides.
The free audit
Find out what AI says when the next attorney asks.
What you get, free, in a 30-minute readout. One audit per practice.
Free. No credit card, no contract, no pitch before you see the numbers. If the audit shows you are already the answer, we will tell you so.