AI Search Visibility for Corporate & IP Firms · SEO / AEO / GEO

A founder just asked ChatGPT which patent attorney to call. Were you the answer?

Forever Cited measures how often ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name your firm for patent, trademark, and corporate work in your market — then builds the cited authority those engines draw on. Measured weekly. Proven against a baseline. One firm per practice area, per market — and for firms that compete nationally, the market is the segment you compete in.

Free · Two minutes to request · No sales call before you see your numbers

  • Your 0–100 score
  • The actual AI answers, named
  • Your three biggest gaps
  • Whether your market is still open

“Who is the best patent attorney near me for a software patent?”

Based on published work, peer standing, and case history, three firms stand out for this:
1 A firm with cited work in Chambers and Legal 500
2 A firm listed on Martindale-Hubbell and the USPTO practitioner roster
3 A firm whose attorneys publish on patent and trademark strategy
Your firm — not named

Every signal that put those three in the answer can be built. None of it is luck.

This is where a founder or general counsel chooses now. Two or three names. Everyone else doesn’t exist.

Built for corporate and IP firmsRules 7.1 and 7.4 by construction
One firm per practice area, per marketfor national firms, the segment you compete in
Baseline-verified reportingevery claim measured, weekly
You approve every wordnothing publishes without you

The problem

You built the deal history. AI never read the deal history.

You built this practice on cited work and on being the firm other lawyers refer up to. But the founder filing a patent, or the GC hiring for a deal, doesn’t start with a referral network — they ask ChatGPT which firm to call. The answer names two or three firms, and if you aren’t one of them, the engagement never even considers you.

Search didn’t die. It moved above the results. AI answers now sit on top of every page Google shows, and engines cite firms with published, cited explainers — not firms with a client list nobody can read. If your firm isn’t publishing, the deal goes to whoever is.

Modern architectural detail with clean repeating lines in soft light
Reputation you can verify. That is what AI systems cite — and what we build.

45%

of consumers used AI tools like ChatGPT to find a local business in the past year — up from 6% the year before.

BrightLocal, Local Consumer Review Survey, 2026

1.2%

of those businesses is all ChatGPT recommends. The answer is two or three names, and the rest are invisible.

SOCi, Visibility Index, 2026

41.9%

of U.S. adults would use ChatGPT to research who to hire for a serious legal matter — up from 28.1% in one year.

iLawyer Marketing, 2026

Be the firm AI names when the next client asks. Measured every week. Proven against a baseline you can check.

That is the whole offer. Everything below is how we do it for your practice area, and what we will never do.

What we measure

The questions founders and GCs ask AI — and that we measure for your firm

These are the prompts your audit runs, in your market, on all five engines. They are the questions a founder or general counsel types before they ever call outside counsel. Your score is how often your firm is in the answer.

  • best patent attorney near me for a software patent
  • trademark lawyer for a startup brand
  • m&a attorney for a mid-size business sale [region]
  • how much does a patent application cost
  • ip litigation firm reviews
  • corporate lawyer for a series a funding round
  • trademark vs patent vs copyright which do i need
  • top-rated ip law firm [region]

Your audit uses your market’s version of these. The weekly run re-asks every one, on every engine, and shows you the answers.

Which of these name your firm today? The free audit runs every one in your market and shows you the answers, word for word.

See my AI answers — free

Guardrails built in

Written to your bar’s rules. Every piece, every week.

ABA Model Rules 7.1 and 7.4, plus USPTO 37 CFR Part 11 for registered practitioners. Every piece we publish for you is written to Rule 7.1 (no false or misleading communication) and Rule 7.4 (no specialization claim without the certifying body named) — and, for registered practitioners, to USPTO 37 CFR Part 11’s conduct rules for patent and trademark practice. You approve every word before it goes live. Most agencies hand you a draft and hope. We hand you a draft that already passed the rule.

What we will never publish for you:

  • Promise a guaranteed patent grant
  • Claim to be “USPTO-endorsed”
  • Claim an unsupported specialization
  • Call you a “top IP firm” or use any superlative you can’t substantiate

The record AI checks

The directories AI checks before it names a corporate or IP firm

When an engine decides whether you are who your site says you are, it reads these first. We claim, correct, and verify every one — same name, same practice area, same office, everywhere.

Martindale-HubbellPeer-review ratings and a firm record engines have trusted for decades.
Super LawyersSelection and practice-area data that engines treat as third-party verification.
USPTO practitioner rosterThe registration record that confirms a patent or trademark practitioner is who your site says.
Chambers and Legal 500Independent rankings that engines weigh heavily for corporate and IP work specifically.

Is your record consistent on every one of these? One mismatch is enough to drop you from the answer. The audit checks each profile against your site.

Check my record — free

Method

How your firm becomes the answer

No jargon, no black box. Three moves, run every week, with the evidence in your inbox.

01Measure

Know exactly where you stand

We score your firm 0–100 across the questions founders and GCs actually ask in your market — on ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, plus classic search, directories, and reviews. That score is frozen as your baseline. Everything after gets proven against it.

02Build

Publish the authority AI cites

AI engines cite firms with published, cited explainers. We draft that authority for you — how patent costs actually break down, trademark versus copyright, what a mid-market deal timeline looks like — carrying the disclaimers your bar and the USPTO require. You approve every word before anything goes live. Directories, entities, and reviews get fixed alongside it.

03Prove

See your name appear

Every week: the same prompts, re-asked. The actual answers, side by side with your baseline. Which engines name you now that didn’t. What moved, what’s next. If a number didn’t move, you’ll see that too — measured honestly or not at all. How we score.

The engagement

One engagement. Everything handled.

This is done-for-you. Your total time commitment is approving content and reading a five-minute weekly report.

Know exactly where you stand.Baseline audit: a Visibility Audit and 0–100 score, frozen as your fixed benchmark
Never guess what AI says about you again.Prompt-level monitoring across ChatGPT, Google AI, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity
Become the source engines quote.Authority content — drafted with verified legal citations — you approve every word
Bar and USPTO compliance built in.Rules 7.1 and 7.4 and 37 CFR Part 11, in every piece
Match everywhere AI looks.Directory, entity, and profile fixes across the sites AI systems trust
Grow the reviews engines weigh.Client reviews — email-only, no review gating, no TCPA exposure
See the proof every week.Your score, the actual answers, and the deltas vs. baseline, in a five-minute report
Keep your confidences where they belong.Private client portal with two-factor security; we never touch case files
Need the site and the data layer first?Foundation builds the site, brand, entity record and intake AI can verify — then this program runs on top of it

Pricing is shared in your audit readout.

Month-to-month. One firm per practice area, per market — when your market is taken, it’s taken.

Check if your market is open — free audit

Risk, reversed

Built so hiring us is the low-risk move

Month-to-month

No annual contract. The weekly proof keeps the relationship, not a signature.

Market exclusivity

We will never work for a competing firm in your practice area and market. In writing. Check if your market is open →

Your bar rules, respected

Nothing publishes without your approval. Every piece carries required disclaimers. Review requests are email-only, never gated.

Your confidences, untouched

We never access case files, matter data, or client records. Your Rule 1.6 obligations stay exactly where they belong: with you.

You own everything

Every article, page, and profile we build belongs to your firm. Leave anytime; it all stays yours.

No fake promises

Nobody can guarantee what AI will say. Anyone who does is lying to you. We guarantee measurement, transparency, and work you can verify.

Questions

Questions corporate and IP firms actually ask

We compete regionally to nationally. Does “per market” even apply to us?

Yes, with the market defined the way you compete. One firm per practice area, per market — and for firms that compete nationally, the market is the segment you compete in, not a radius on a map. You tell us the segment; we put it in writing and turn away everyone else in it.

Most of our work comes from other attorneys and repeat clients. Why does AI matter?

Because the founder or GC on the other end of that introduction still checks first. They ask ChatGPT which firm to call for a patent or a deal before they take the meeting. When the answer names three other firms and not you, that introduction gets weaker. Visibility doesn’t replace referrals — it keeps them from leaking.

Is this compliant with bar advertising rules and USPTO practice rules?

By construction. You approve every word before publication, Rule 7.1 and 7.4 language is built into every piece, USPTO 37 CFR Part 11 conduct rules govern anything touching patent or trademark practice, review requests are email-only with no gating, and we never touch case files.

How long until AI starts naming my firm?

Directory and technical fixes usually move numbers inside 30 days. Content authority that changes which firms AI cites for patent, trademark, and corporate work typically compounds over 60–90 days. You see the evidence weekly from day one, including what hasn’t moved yet.

We already pay an SEO agency. Isn’t this the same thing?

Ask them which AI engines named your firm last week, for which prompts. Most can’t answer — they optimize for a results page a founder or GC is scrolling past. We measure the actual answers those buyers are shown, and traditional SEO is included, not ignored.

What does an engagement cost?

We share exact pricing in your audit readout, after we’ve seen your market and scope. What you should know now: it’s a done-for-you engagement with exclusivity — one firm per practice area, per market, the market being the segment you compete in — billed month-to-month with no long-term contract.

What do I get in the free audit — and what’s the catch?

Your 0–100 score, the real prompts founders and GCs use in your market, the actual AI answers showing who gets named, and your three biggest gaps — delivered in a 30-minute readout. The catch: we take one firm per practice area, per market — for national firms, per segment — so the audit also decides fit, on both sides.

The free audit

Find out what AI says when the next founder asks who to call.

Get your free Visibility Audit Scheduling link within one business day

What you get, free, in a 30-minute readout. One audit per firm.

Your 0–100 Visibility Score — frozen as the baseline if you go ahead
The actual AI answers for your market — which firms get named, and why
Your three biggest gaps — in order, with what closes each one
Whether your market is still open — one firm per practice area, per market

Free. No credit card, no contract, no pitch before you see the numbers. If the audit shows you are already the answer, we will tell you so.